vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.3× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -31.4%, a 38.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
PDM vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.3M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $-45.0M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | -31.4% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $199.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $24.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | -31.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $1.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $236.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $617.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 110.3% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $836.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | 110.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PDM
Segment breakdown not available.
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
