vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.9M vs $76.4M, roughly 1.9× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -30.3% vs -39.1%, a 8.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (31.0% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
PDM vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.9M | $76.4M |
| Net Profit | $-43.2M | $-29.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -40.6% |
| Net Margin | -30.3% | -39.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.3% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.3% | -58.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $-0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $53.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.5M | $44.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.8M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 56.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -50.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -62.1% |
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | -48.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.2% | -58.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $731.0K | $286.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | $51.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $365.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $508.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.49× | 0.14× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $214.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $225.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $51.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $51.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $251.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $264.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $374.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $382.9M |
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.23× | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $140.6M | $-10.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -15.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-58.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.4M | $-32.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-34.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -76.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PDM
| Atlanta GA | $45.7M | 32% |
| Dallas TX | $24.1M | 17% |
| Orlando FL | $19.3M | 13% |
| New York NY | $14.7M | 10% |
| Northern Virginia Washington D.C. | $12.9M | 9% |
| Minneapolis MN | $11.4M | 8% |
| Boston MA | $9.8M | 7% |
| Real Estate Other | $7.8M | 5% |
PRCT
| Hand Pieces And Other Consumables | $34.1M | 45% |
| System Sales And Rentals | $27.5M | 36% |
| Other | $9.8M | 13% |
| Service Revenue | $5.0M | 7% |