vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.4× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -31.4%, a 33.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.0% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
PDM vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.3M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $-45.0M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | -31.4% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.3M | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | -31.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.10 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.3M | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 110.3% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | 110.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
