vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $137.0M, roughly 1.0× STRATASYS LTD.). Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -31.4% vs -40.6%, a 9.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.0% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
PDM vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.3M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $-45.0M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | -31.4% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $138.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $-25.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -18.9% |
| Q1 26 | -31.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | -18.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $70.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $850.5M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 110.3% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $-2.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.6% |
| Q1 26 | 110.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
