vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STAG Industrial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($224.2M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.6× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs -31.4%, a 59.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STAG Industrial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, STAG Industrial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
PDM vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.3M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | $-45.0M | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | -31.4% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.3M | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.0M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | -31.4% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.10 | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.3M | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
