vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and W&T OFFSHORE INC (WTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $121.7M, roughly 1.2× W&T OFFSHORE INC). W&T OFFSHORE INC runs the higher net margin — -22.3% vs -31.4%, a 9.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, W&T OFFSHORE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.1% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.0% CAGR vs -7.0%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Edison Chouest Offshore (ECO), which started as Edison Chouest Boat Rentals in 1960, is a family of companies in the marine transportation business based in Cut Off, Louisiana. ECO owns and operates a fleet of platform supply vessels, Subsea Construction / IMR vessels, a Riserless Light Well Intervention vessel, Anchor handling tug supply vessels, Oil Spill Response Vessels, and Well Stimulation Vessels, as well as an independently owned fleet of Research Vessels and Ice Breakers.
PDM vs WTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.3M | $121.7M |
| Net Profit | $-45.0M | $-27.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -15.7% |
| Net Margin | -31.4% | -22.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | -16.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $121.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $127.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $122.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $129.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $120.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $121.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $142.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | $-27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $-71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $-30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $-23.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $-15.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.4% |
| Q1 26 | -31.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | -22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | -56.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | -17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | -23.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | -19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | -30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | -10.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3M | $140.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $350.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $-199.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $955.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $120.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $105.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $126.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $123.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $350.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $350.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $350.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $393.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $392.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $391.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $-199.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $-172.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $-102.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $-82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $-52.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $-31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $955.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $960.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | 78.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $25.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 110.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $37.4M |
| Q1 26 | 110.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PDM
Segment breakdown not available.
WTI
| Oil And Condensate | $76.0M | 62% |
| Natural Gas Production | $36.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $6.9M | 6% |
| Other | $2.2M | 2% |
