vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYN) and Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Palladyne AI Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7M vs $1.0M, roughly 1.7× Shattuck Labs, Inc.). Palladyne AI Corp. runs the higher net margin — -89.9% vs -1005.6%, a 915.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Palladyne AI Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (118.3% vs -66.6%). Palladyne AI Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-8.7M vs $-9.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Shattuck Labs, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.7% CAGR vs -30.5%).
Palladyne AI Corp. is an American company known for most of its existence primarily as a developer of robots. Palladyne was founded in 1983 as Sarcos Research Corporation. In 2023, Sarcos shifted its business focus to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) software for robotic applications, discontinuing its hardware operations. In March 2024, the company changed its name to Palladyne AI.
Shattuck Labs, Inc.STTKEarnings & Financial Report
Shattuck Labs, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing innovative immunotherapies for cancer and autoimmune diseases. It uses its proprietary Agonist Redirected Checkpoint platform to develop bifunctional fusion proteins, with multiple oncology product candidates in active clinical development stages.
PDYN vs STTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7M | $1.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | $-10.1M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -560.7% | -1071.6% |
| Net Margin | -89.9% | -1005.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 118.3% | -66.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 97.2% | 39.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $860.0K | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $761.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $871.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.7M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.1M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.2M | $-18.5M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 79.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -560.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -937.8% | -1071.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -797.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -405.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -838.0% | -597.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -213.3% | -1427.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -213.7% | -1797.7% |
| Q4 25 | -89.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -434.9% | -1005.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -737.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1330.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -814.7% | -556.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -196.2% | -1339.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -210.1% | -1659.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.55 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.27 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.28 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.1M | $42.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $74.7M | $93.2M |
| Total Assets | $95.7M | $100.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.6M | $60.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.3M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.8M | $76.0M |
| Q4 25 | $74.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.8M | $93.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.8M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $67.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.4M | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $128.8M |
| Q4 25 | $95.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.9M | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $64.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.3M | $77.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.7M | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.1M | $128.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.4M | $146.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.5M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.7M | $-9.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -526.2% | -900.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.2% | 7.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.3M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.8M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.2M | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.7M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -526.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -776.0% | -900.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -445.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3008.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -517.8% | -537.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -218.9% | -679.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -212.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
