vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Palladyne AI Corp. (PDYNW) and Symbotic Inc. (SYM), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Symbotic Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($630.0M vs $1.7M, roughly 379.3× Palladyne AI Corp.). Symbotic Inc. runs the higher net margin — -89.9% vs 0.4%, a 90.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Palladyne AI Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (118.3% vs 29.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Symbotic Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.9% CAGR vs -30.5%).
Palladyne AI Corp. is an American company known for most of its existence primarily as a developer of robots. Palladyne was founded in 1983 as Sarcos Research Corporation. In 2023, Sarcos shifted its business focus to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) software for robotic applications, discontinuing its hardware operations. In March 2024, the company changed its name to Palladyne AI.
Symbotic Inc. is an American robotics warehouse automation company based in Wilmington, Massachusetts.
PDYNW vs SYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7M | $630.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | -560.7% | 1.0% |
| Net Margin | -89.9% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 118.3% | 29.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 97.2% | 174.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $630.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $860.0K | $618.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $592.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $549.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $761.0K | $486.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $871.0K | $503.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $491.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $424.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.5M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.7M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-53.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.2M | $-6.6M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.4% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.2% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 79.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.2% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | -560.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -937.8% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -797.4% | -6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -405.3% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -852.0% | -5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -838.0% | -4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -213.3% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -213.7% | -12.0% |
| Q4 25 | -89.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -434.9% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -737.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1330.9% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6960.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -814.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -196.2% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -210.1% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.55 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.96 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.27 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.28 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.1M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $74.7M | $663.8M |
| Total Assets | $95.7M | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $47.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $777.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.6M | $954.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $903.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.3M | $727.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $870.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.8M | $901.4M |
| Q4 25 | $74.7M | $663.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.8M | $221.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.8M | $210.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.5M | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.4M | $197.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8M | $418.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $417.1M |
| Q4 25 | $95.7M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.4M | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.5M | $191.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -526.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 14.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 73.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.3M | $530.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $-138.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $-99.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.8M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.2M | $21.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $197.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $-120.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.3M | $18.6M |
| Q4 25 | -526.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -776.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -445.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -676.0% | 40.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -517.8% | -23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -218.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -212.1% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 73.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PDYNW
Segment breakdown not available.
SYM
| Systems | $590.3M | 94% |
| Operation Services | $28.8M | 5% |
| Software Maintenance And Support | $10.9M | 2% |
| Revision Of Prior Period Change In Accounting Principle Adjustment | $2.9M | 0% |
| Related Party | $1.1M | 0% |
