vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and PHOTRONICS INC (PLAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PHOTRONICS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.4M vs $190.7M, roughly 1.1× Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.). Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.4% vs 10.9%, a 6.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs -3.8%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Photronics, Inc. is an American semiconductor photomask manufacturer. It was the third largest photomask supplier globally as of 2009. Photronics is a member of the eBeam Initiative.
PECO vs PLAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $210.4M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 22.9% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | 10.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | -5.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | -32.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $210.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $211.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $212.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $222.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $211.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $217.0M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $36.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 16.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $0.68 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.58 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $575.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $16.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $575.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $558.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $642.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $606.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $559.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $16.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $19.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $21.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $25.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $28.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.5M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $50.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $25.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 11.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | 2.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $64.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $50.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $31.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | $78.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $68.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $75.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $76.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.0% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | 3.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 1.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | 2.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
PLAB
| High End Integrated Circuits | $53.6M | 25% |
| High End Flat Panel Displays | $53.5M | 25% |
| KR | $43.7M | 21% |
| Other | $42.1M | 20% |
| Mainstream Flat Panel Displays | $9.1M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 4% |
