vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Proto Labs Inc (PRLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($190.7M vs $136.5M, roughly 1.4× Proto Labs Inc). On growth, Proto Labs Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.1% vs 7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs 3.3%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Protolabs is a company that provides rapid manufacturing of 3D printed, CNC-machined, sheet metal, and injection-molded custom parts for prototyping and production. Markets like medical devices, aerospace, electronics, appliances, automotive and consumer products use these parts. Protolabs' headquarters are located in Maple Plain, Minnesota, with Minnesota-based manufacturing facilities in Plymouth, Brooklyn Park, and Rosemount, along with additional facilities in Nashua, New Hampshire and Ca...
PECO vs PRLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $136.5M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.0% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 12.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | $136.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $135.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $135.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $126.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $121.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $125.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $125.6M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $4.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 3.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $128.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $673.9M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $763.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $128.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $103.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $100.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $112.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $673.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $664.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $664.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $656.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $670.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $680.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $685.2M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $763.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $743.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $737.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $743.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $753.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $758.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $16.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $8.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $59.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | $18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $14.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 5.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | 3.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | 3.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
PRLB
| CNC Machining Firstcut | $65.5M | 48% |
| Injection Molding Protomold | $47.6M | 35% |
| Three D Printing Fineline | $18.8M | 14% |
| Sheet Metal | $4.4M | 3% |
