vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($190.7M vs $140.7M, roughly 1.4× Purple Innovation, Inc.). Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.4% vs -2.3%, a 19.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Purple Innovation, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs 8.3%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Purple Carrot is a Needham, Massachusetts-based, and 100% plant-based meal kit company. Founded by Andy Levitt, it offers both prepared meals as well as meal kits to subscribers weekly. As stated in a 2022 article in Cosmopolitan, “each Purple Carrot meal kit results in 72% less carbon being released into the atmosphere as compared to the standard American meal.”
PECO vs PRPL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $140.7M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | -1.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | -2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | 62.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | $140.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $118.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $105.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $104.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $118.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $120.3M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $-39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $27.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.7% |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -39.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.1% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | -18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -33.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $24.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $126.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $-29.7M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $296.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $23.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $126.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $70.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $-29.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $-26.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $-15.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $66.4M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $296.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $302.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $303.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $293.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $307.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $309.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $362.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | 3.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $-5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-7.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $-968.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $-8.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-25.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $101.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.2% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | -330.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
PRPL
| Cost Of Revenues | $81.7M | 58% |
| Other | $59.0M | 42% |
