vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($212.2M vs $190.7M, roughly 1.1× Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.). LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.8% vs 17.4%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.6% vs 7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., is an American SaaS company that offers a data connectivity platform whose services include data onboarding, the transfer of offline data online for marketing purposes.
PECO vs RAMP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $212.2M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | $39.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 71.9% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | 18.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 8.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | 255.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | $212.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $194.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $188.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $195.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $176.0M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $-7.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 72.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 70.6% |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.0% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | -4.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $403.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $962.3M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $403.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $376.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $371.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $420.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $384.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $348.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $342.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $962.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $943.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $947.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $948.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $957.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $932.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $951.9M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $57.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $55.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $-9.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.4% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | -2.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | 4.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | 32.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
RAMP
Segment breakdown not available.
