vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Shutterstock, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.2M vs $190.7M, roughly 1.2× Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.). Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.4% vs -7.3%, a 24.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs 1.4%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Shutterstock, Inc. is an American provider of stock photography, stock footage, stock music, and editing tools; it is headquartered in New York. Founded in 2002 by programmer and photographer Jon Oringer, Shutterstock maintains a library of around 200 million royalty-free stock photos, vector graphics, and illustrations, with around 10 million video clips and music tracks available for licensing. Originally a subscription site only, Shutterstock expanded beyond subscriptions into à la carte p...
PECO vs SSTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $220.2M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | $-16.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.1% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | -1021.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | $220.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $260.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $242.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $250.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $250.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $220.1M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $18.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $3.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $178.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $581.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $178.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $165.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $112.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $111.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $74.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $581.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $594.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $586.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $547.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $518.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $522.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $520.4M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $36.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $25.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $123.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | $36.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | $25.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $28.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-952.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-26.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.6% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | 5.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | 7.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
SSTK
Segment breakdown not available.
