vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tecnoglass Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.3M vs $190.7M, roughly 1.3× Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.). Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.4% vs 10.6%, a 6.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
PECO vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $219.7M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.3% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $129.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $144.7M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $574.8M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $942.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 0.25× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $34.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | 0.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
