vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC (TR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($196.3M vs $190.7M, roughly 1.0× Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.). Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.4% vs 14.7%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
PECO vs TR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $196.3M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $193.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $150.7M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $15.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.5% |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.2% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $176.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $941.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $176.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $163.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $131.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $918.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $893.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $879.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $870.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $870.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $841.4M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $61.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $96.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $-12.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | -0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
TR
| Products | $194.3M | 99% |
| Rental And Royalty | $1.9M | 1% |