vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Public Service Enterprise Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.2× Tapestry, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 10.8%, a 11.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Public Service Enterprise Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.3% vs 14.0%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $-408.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 2.8%).
The Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. (PSEG) is a publicly traded energy company based in Newark, New Jersey, where it has been based since its founding. It was founded in 1985, with its roots tracing back to 1903.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
PEG vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $315.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 10.8% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.3% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.1% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $315.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $622.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $589.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $520.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $434.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $532.0M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.1% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.3% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.24 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.17 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.18 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.04 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.87 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.06 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $132.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.5B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.0B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $57.6B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $132.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.0M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $894.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $22.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.4B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.3B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $17.0B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.0B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.7B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $57.6B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.9B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.1B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.4B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.4B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.33× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.30× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.35× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $721.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-408.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -14.0% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 38.7% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.29× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $26.0M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $721.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $478.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $367.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $623.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $482.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $661.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-408.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-309.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-611.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-145.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-355.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-136.0M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | -14.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.9% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 38.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.9% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.29× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.69× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.28× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.11× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.24× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PEG
| PSEG Power Other | $1.1B | 37% |
| Electric Distribution Contracts | $929.0M | 32% |
| Gas Distribution Contracts | $840.0M | 29% |
| Other | $71.0M | 2% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
