vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TDH Holdings, Inc. (PETZ) and QMMM Holdings Ltd (QMMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
QMMM Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0M vs $1.5M, roughly 1.4× TDH Holdings, Inc.). QMMM Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — -7.1% vs -90.1%, a 83.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
TDH Holdings, Inc. is a pet product enterprise that develops, manufactures and distributes a comprehensive portfolio of pet food, nutritional treats, and daily pet supplies for dogs and cats. Its primary market is mainland China, catering to both online e-commerce and offline physical retail customer segments.
PETZ vs QMMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2023 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $2.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.3M | $-146.1K |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 27.1% |
| Operating Margin | -149.8% | -6.5% |
| Net Margin | -90.1% | -7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.5M | — |
| Q1 25 | — | $-146.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-612.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.3M | — |
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | 27.5% | — |
| Q1 25 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -46.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | -149.8% | — |
| Q1 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -45.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | -90.1% | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.8M | $167.9K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.2M | $3.9M |
| Total Assets | $36.5M | $4.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 25 | — | $167.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $218.9K | ||
| Q2 23 | $31.8M | — |
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | $21.2M | — |
| Q1 25 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $36.5M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-581.1K | $-301.2K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 25 | — | $-301.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-184.6K | ||
| Q2 23 | $-581.1K | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
