vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phreesia, Inc. (PHR) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $120.3M, roughly 1.7× Phreesia, Inc.). Phreesia, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs 2.2%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phreesia, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.7% vs 5.2%). Phreesia, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($12.2M vs $1.1M).
Phreesia, Inc. is a software as a service company that offers healthcare organizations a set of applications to automate and manage patient intake.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
PHR vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.3M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $4.3M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.7% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.7% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.3M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.3M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $654.0K | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.4M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $320.3M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $423.5M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.4M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.3M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.9M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $320.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $423.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $400.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.5M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $12.2M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.1% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.62× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.62× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.68× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PHR
| Subscription And Services | $55.5M | 46% |
| Network Solutions | $37.4M | 31% |
| Payment Processing Fees | $27.4M | 23% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
