vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phreesia, Inc. (PHR) and WEALTHFRONT CORP (WLTH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phreesia, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.3M vs $93.2M, roughly 1.3× WEALTHFRONT CORP). WEALTHFRONT CORP runs the higher net margin — 33.1% vs 3.5%, a 29.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Phreesia, Inc. is a software as a service company that offers healthcare organizations a set of applications to automate and manage patient intake.
Wealthfront Corporation is a financial services company based in Palo Alto, California, founded by Andy Rachleff and Dan Carroll in 2008. As of 2025, Wealthfront had $88 billion AUM across more than 1.3 million clients.
PHR vs WLTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.3M | $93.2M |
| Net Profit | $4.3M | $30.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 37.3% |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | 33.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $120.3M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $30.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $654.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 37.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.4M | $266.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $320.3M | $125.4M |
| Total Assets | $423.5M | $810.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $106.4M | $266.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $320.3M | $125.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $423.5M | $810.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $400.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $12.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PHR
| Subscription And Services | $55.5M | 46% |
| Network Solutions | $37.4M | 31% |
| Payment Processing Fees | $27.4M | 23% |
WLTH
Segment breakdown not available.
