vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($630.0M vs $508.3M, roughly 1.2× TIC Solutions, Inc.). Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.9% vs -9.3%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Park Hotels & Resorts is an American real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on hotel properties, based in Tysons, Virginia. It was formed in 2017 as a spin-off from Hilton Worldwide.
PK vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $630.0M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $12.0M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 121.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $630.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $629.0M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $610.0M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.0M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $630.0M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $625.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $686.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-205.0M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.0M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.0M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -32.6% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.0% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.29 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.30 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $156.0M | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | — | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $156.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $232.0M | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $278.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.0M | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $402.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $480.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $449.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.14× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.12× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.11× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.0M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.0M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.0M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.0M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PK
| Comparable Hotel Revenues | $617.0M | 98% |
| Other | $13.0M | 2% |
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |