vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) and SiriusPoint Ltd (SPNT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SiriusPoint Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($973.7M vs $253.4M, roughly 3.8× Palomar Holdings, Inc.). On growth, Palomar Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (62.7% vs 58.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Palomar Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (46.2% CAGR vs 19.2%).
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that primarily provides property insurance products for catastrophe-exposed residential and commercial assets. It mainly operates across the United States, focusing on core segments including earthquake, flood, and windstorm coverage to meet high-risk property protection demands of customers.
SiriusPoint Ltd is a global specialty insurance and reinsurance provider based in Pembroke, Bermuda. It offers property, casualty, specialty line coverages and alternative capital solutions, serving commercial clients and risk carriers across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and other key markets, focusing on rigorous underwriting and stable risk-adjusted returns.
PLMR vs SPNT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $253.4M | $973.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $244.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 28.7% | 28.8% |
| Net Margin | — | 25.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 62.7% | 58.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1535.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.05 | $1.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $973.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.7M | $755.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $203.3M | $748.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.6M | $727.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $155.8M | $612.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.5M | $562.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.1M | $743.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.5M | $685.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $244.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.5M | $90.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.5M | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $61.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-17.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $113.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $94.8M |
| Q4 25 | 28.7% | 28.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.0% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | $2.05 | $1.92 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.87 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.68 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.29 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.15 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.00 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | $0.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.9M | $731.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $688.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $942.7M | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $12.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $106.9M | $731.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.7M | $582.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.3M | $732.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.3M | $740.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.4M | $682.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.5M | $640.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.8M | $598.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | $867.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $682.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $678.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $663.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $639.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $660.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $648.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $770.6M |
| Q4 25 | $942.7M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $878.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $847.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $790.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $729.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $703.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $532.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $501.7M | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $12.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $12.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $13.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $409.1M | $-26.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $409.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 161.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $700.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $409.1M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $155.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.9M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.2M | $-88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.2M | $107.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.3M | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.1M | $-149.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $58.8M |
| Q4 25 | $409.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 161.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 167.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.60× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.03× | -1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.29× | 6.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | -1.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.26× | 0.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
