vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. (PLX) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.1M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.5× High Roller Technologies, Inc.). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs -60.3%, a 118.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, High Roller Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-16.4% vs -49.9%). Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.6M vs $-90.0K).
Protalix BioTherapeutics is an Israeli pharmaceutical company that manufactures a plant-based enzyme, taliglucerase alfa, which has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of Gaucher disease.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
PLX vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.1M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 49.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -51.1% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | -60.3% | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -49.9% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -184.8% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $10.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.0K | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-6.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 15.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -51.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.0% | -47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -53.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -60.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.8% | -48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -57.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $14.7M | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $48.2M | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $82.3M | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $23.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $48.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.9M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.2M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $33.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $82.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.5M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.6M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $84.4M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.0M | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.6M | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.8% | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-13.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.7M | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.1M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $3.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.2M | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.2% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -53.0% | -53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 31.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 2.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | -31.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLX
| Products | $8.7M | 95% |
| Other | $428.0K | 5% |
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
