vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PLEXUS CORP (PLXS) and QuidelOrtho Corp (QDEL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLEXUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $699.9M, roughly 1.5× QuidelOrtho Corp). PLEXUS CORP runs the higher net margin — 3.8% vs -104.7%, a 108.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLEXUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs -3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, PLEXUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs -2.9%).
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
QuidelOrtho Corporation is an American manufacturer of diagnostic healthcare products that are sold worldwide.
PLXS vs QDEL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $699.9M |
| Net Profit | $41.2M | $-733.0M |
| Gross Margin | 9.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.1% | -100.7% |
| Net Margin | 3.8% | -104.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.6% | -3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.9% | -3583.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.51 | $-10.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $699.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $613.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $692.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $707.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $727.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $637.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $711.0M |
| Q1 26 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-733.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-178.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-147.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7B |
| Q1 26 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -100.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -29.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -247.3% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -104.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -41.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -23.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -239.9% |
| Q1 26 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-25.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $248.8M | $98.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $248.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $151.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $127.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $143.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $107.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $78.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.68× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-45.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-94.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -13.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-153.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-46.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $63.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $117.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-700.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-84.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $71.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-133.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -20.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $612.0M | 57% |
| Americas | $345.0M | 32% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $118.0M | 11% |
QDEL
| Labs | $373.8M | 53% |
| Point Of Care | $164.6M | 24% |
| Immunohematology | $142.0M | 20% |
| Donor Screening | $14.7M | 2% |
| Molecular Diagnostics | $4.8M | 1% |
| Collaborative Arrangement Transaction With Party To Collaborative Arrangement | $2.1M | 0% |
