vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PLEXUS CORP (PLXS) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snap-on is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× PLEXUS CORP). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 4.3%, a 17.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLEXUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, PLEXUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs 2.0%).
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
PLXS vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $49.8M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 10.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.5% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.82 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $271.2M |
| Q1 26 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $303.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $248.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $301.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $277.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
