vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PLEXUS CORP (PLXS) and Solventum (SOLV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Solventum is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.7× PLEXUS CORP). PLEXUS CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 3.2%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLEXUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs -3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, PLEXUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs -0.4%).
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
Solventum Corporation is an American health care company that was spun off from 3M on April 1, 2024.
PLXS vs SOLV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $49.8M | $63.0M |
| Gross Margin | 10.2% | 51.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 6.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 3.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | -3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.5% | 103.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.82 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $90.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $137.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $89.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 54.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 56.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.6% |
| Q1 26 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 80.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $303.1M | $878.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $14.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $248.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $878.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $492.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $534.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $762.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $772.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $897.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $95.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $32.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-10.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $76.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $169.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $219.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $169.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $355.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-80.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $92.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $297.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
SOLV
| Infection Prevention And Surgical Solutions | $752.0M | 38% |
| Cost Of Software And Rentals | $508.0M | 25% |
| Health Information Systems Segment | $347.0M | 17% |
| Dental Solutions Segment | $343.0M | 17% |
| Related Party | $14.0M | 1% |
