vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.2M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.0× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -106.3%, a 116.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sila Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.4% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
PLYM vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $51.2M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $-54.4M | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | -102.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -106.3% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.4% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -248.5% | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.23 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.6M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.6M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $43.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2M | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-54.4M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -102.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -106.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.9% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 309.9% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.23 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.24 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.35 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.1M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $90.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $646.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $470.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $436.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $475.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $484.6M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.1M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.6M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.9M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $36.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.67× | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.12× | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.67× | 2.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
