vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Philip Morris International (PM) and Supermicro (SMCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Supermicro is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.2B vs $10.1B, roughly 1.0× Philip Morris International). Philip Morris International runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 4.7%, a 19.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Supermicro posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (122.7% vs 9.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Supermicro's revenue compounded faster (38.3% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Philip Morris International Inc. (PMI) is a tobacco company, with products sold in over 180 countries. Marlboro is PMI’s most recognized brand, but in the last quarter of 2023, Iqos generated the greatest revenue. Philip Morris International is often referred to as one of the companies comprising Big Tobacco. The company ranked No. 121 in the 2025 Fortune 500 list of the largest US corporations by total revenue.
Super Micro Computer, Inc., doing business as Supermicro, is an American information technology company based in San Jose, California. The company is one of the largest producers of high-performance and high-efficiency servers, while also providing server management software, and storage systems for various markets, including enterprise data centers, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, 5G, and edge computing.
PM vs SMCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.1B | $10.2B |
| Net Profit | $2.4B | $483.4M |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 9.9% |
| Operating Margin | 38.4% | 6.1% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.1% | 122.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 344.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.56 | $0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $10.1B | $10.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | $483.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $400.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $168.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $195.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $108.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-579.0M | $320.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $424.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $297.2M |
| Q1 26 | 68.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.7% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 64.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 66.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.7% | 10.2% |
| Q1 26 | 38.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.4% | 5.4% |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.56 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.36 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.23 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.95 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.72 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.37 | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.97 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.54 | $-12.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.5B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $49.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $7.6B |
| Total Assets | $68.9B | $23.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $49.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-10.0B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.0B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.9B | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.8B | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.7B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | $68.9B | $23.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.2B | $28.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.1B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.5B | $14.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.1B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.9B | $10.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.8B | $9.8B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
