vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POWELL INDUSTRIES INC (POWL) and RISKIFIED LTD. (RSKD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
POWELL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($251.2M vs $234.0M, roughly 1.1× RISKIFIED LTD.). POWELL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs -13.2%, a 29.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Powell Industries, Inc. is a manufacturer of Integrated/Packaged Solutions and Electrical Equipment to monitor and control the distribution of electrical power in commercial and industrial markets founded in 1947. Its headquarters is in Houston, Texas.
Riskified is a publicly traded software company headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel, with additional offices in New York City. The company provides software-as-a-service (SaaS) solutions focused on fraud prevention, chargeback management, and risk intelligence for e-commerce merchants.
POWL vs RSKD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $251.2M | $234.0M |
| Net Profit | $41.4M | $-30.8M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 52.2% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | -19.0% |
| Net Margin | 16.5% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.40 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $251.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.0M | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $286.3M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $278.6M | $76.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.1M | $213.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $288.2M | $141.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $255.1M | $68.9M |
| Q4 25 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.4M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.2M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.3M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.1M | $-55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.2M | $-34.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.5M | $-18.0M |
| Q4 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.4% | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.7% | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 55.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.6% | 52.0% |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | -19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | -20.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | -32.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.9% | -31.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | -33.4% |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | -15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | -24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | -26.1% |
| Q4 25 | $3.40 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.23 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.96 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.86 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.77 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.79 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $500.8M | $371.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $668.9M | $382.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $495.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $500.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.5M | $371.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $433.0M | $371.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $389.3M | $371.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $373.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $358.4M | $440.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $440.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $365.3M | $440.8M |
| Q4 25 | $668.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $640.8M | $382.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $594.9M | $382.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $541.4M | $382.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $496.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $483.1M | $491.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.7M | $491.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $393.8M | $491.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $495.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $495.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $965.4M | $495.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $912.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $928.2M | $601.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.0M | $601.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $849.6M | $601.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $43.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.05× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $161.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $41.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.51× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
POWL
| Oil And Gas Service | $97.9M | 39% |
| Electricity | $69.3M | 28% |
| Commercial And Other Industrial | $40.6M | 16% |
| Petrochemical | $22.8M | 9% |
| Other Customers | $12.0M | 5% |
| Light Rail Traction Power Customer | $8.6M | 3% |
RSKD
Segment breakdown not available.
