vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.1M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.1× Sezzle Inc.). Sezzle Inc. runs the higher net margin — 54.6% vs -38.1%, a 92.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sezzle Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.6% vs 20.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Sezzle Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (76.0% CAGR vs 24.8%).
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
Sezzle is a publicly traded financial technology company headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S, with operations in the United States and Canada. The company provides an alternative payment platform offering interest-free installment plans at selected online stores. As of June 2021, the Sezzle platform had over 10 million user sign-ups and over 48,000 participating merchants.
PRCT vs SEZL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $83.1M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $-31.6M | $42.7M |
| Gross Margin | 64.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | 70.6% |
| Net Margin | -38.1% | 54.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 61.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | 68.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.56 | $1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.4M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.3M | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.2M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.2M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.4M | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.4M | $30.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-31.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-29.8M | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.4M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.6M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.7M | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.0M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.6M | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | 64.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 64.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -40.6% | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.8% | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.0% | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.9% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.4% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -50.3% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | -38.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -39.1% | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.7% | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.7% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.8% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -35.9% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -48.0% | 98.4% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.54 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.38 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.34 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.40 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.50 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $245.6M | $64.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $51.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $347.7M | $169.8M |
| Total Assets | $487.1M | $400.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.15× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $245.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $286.5M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.3M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $302.7M | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $316.2M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.7M | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.1M | $58.0M |
| Q1 26 | $51.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $347.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $365.9M | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $380.3M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.8M | $130.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $389.2M | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $402.2M | $87.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $241.2M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.8M | $50.3M |
| Q1 26 | $487.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $508.1M | $400.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $511.5M | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $513.1M | $350.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $519.4M | $298.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $534.0M | $298.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $374.1M | $252.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.4M | $212.1M |
| Q1 26 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $70.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $70.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 90.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $209.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-10.3M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.6M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.0M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.0M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.4M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.8M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $22.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.5M | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.8M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.8M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.6M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.0M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.8M | $22.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.9% | 90.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | 110.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.2% | 108.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -49.2% | 118.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.6% | 98.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.4% | 73.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
SEZL
| Merchant And Partner Income | $28.9M | 37% |
| Transaction Income | $25.9M | 33% |
| Income From Other Services Late Payment Fees | $20.5M | 26% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |