vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT) and TWIN DISC INC (TWIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TWIN DISC INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($90.2M vs $83.1M, roughly 1.1× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). TWIN DISC INC runs the higher net margin — 24.8% vs -38.1%, a 62.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 10.3%).
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
Twin Disc, Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes power transmission equipment for a wide range of applications, including marine, off-road vehicle, and industrial. The company was founded in 1918 to manufacture clutches for farm tractors. It is now a worldwide company with subsidiaries or sales offices in Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, and South America.
PRCT vs TWIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $83.1M | $90.2M |
| Net Profit | $-31.6M | $22.4M |
| Gross Margin | 64.9% | 24.8% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | -38.1% | 24.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | 2334.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.56 | $1.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.4M | $90.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.3M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.2M | $96.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.2M | $81.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | $89.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.4M | $72.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.4M | $84.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-31.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-29.8M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.4M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.7M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $919.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.0M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.6M | $7.4M |
| Q1 26 | 64.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.8% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.4% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 64.0% | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.0% | 29.7% |
| Q1 26 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -40.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -50.3% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | -38.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -39.1% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.7% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.8% | -1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -35.9% | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -48.0% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.54 | $1.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.38 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.34 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.50 | $0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $245.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $51.7M | $44.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $347.7M | $184.5M |
| Total Assets | $487.1M | $384.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.15× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $245.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $286.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $302.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $316.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $51.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.6M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $43.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.5M | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.5M | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.5M | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.4M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.4M | $25.8M |
| Q1 26 | $347.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $365.9M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $380.3M | $160.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.8M | $164.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $389.2M | $149.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $402.2M | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $241.2M | $157.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.8M | $154.7M |
| Q1 26 | $487.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $508.1M | $384.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $511.5M | $363.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $513.1M | $355.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $519.4M | $332.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $534.0M | $307.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $374.1M | $323.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.4M | $312.1M |
| Q1 26 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.14× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.13× | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.13× | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.21× | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | 0.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-70.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-10.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.6M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.0M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.4M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $11.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.5M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.8M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.8M | $906.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.6M | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.0M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.8M | $10.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | -13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -49.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.6% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.4% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
TWIN
Segment breakdown not available.
