vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Presurance Holdings, Inc. (PRHI) and SES AI Corp (SES). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Presurance Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.7M vs $4.6M, roughly 1.2× SES AI Corp). Presurance Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -369.2% vs -373.5%, a 4.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
SES S.A. is a Luxembourgish communications satellite operator supplying video and data connectivity worldwide to broadcasters, content and internet service providers, mobile and fixed network operators, governments and institutions.
PRHI vs SES — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.7M | $4.6M |
| Net Profit | $-17.0M | $-17.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | -322.7% | -387.7% |
| Net Margin | -369.2% | -373.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -61.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.9% | 50.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.40 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-17.0M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.0K | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -322.7% | -387.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -42.7% | -262.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.6% | -652.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.9% | -401.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -177.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -45.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -369.2% | -373.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -58.2% | -293.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | -642.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | -214.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -172.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 329.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.40 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.32 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.08 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.1M | $29.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $12.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.0M | $214.8M |
| Total Assets | $239.3M | $272.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $52.1M | $29.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.3M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.3M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $56.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | $214.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $228.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $249.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.6M | $269.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $239.3M | $272.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $285.0M | $288.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.3M | $290.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.1M | $306.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $301.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.75× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-43.9M | $-10.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -243.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 15.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-61.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-43.9M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-681.0K | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.3M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -243.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -206.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -329.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -410.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.34× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 110.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
