vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Primoris Services Corp (PRIM) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.0× Primoris Services Corp). Science Applications International Corp runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs 2.8%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Primoris Services Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs 2.6%). Primoris Services Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($121.1M vs $120.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Primoris Services Corp's revenue compounded faster (14.7% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Primoris Services Corporation is a publicly traded specialty construction and infrastructure company based in the United States, with a particular focus on pipelines for natural gas, wastewater and water. As of 2014 it was a Fortune 1000 company.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
PRIM vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $51.7M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | 9.4% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 2.8% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.2% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.94 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $51.7M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.3M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.0M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.4M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.5M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.9M | $39.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.94 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.73 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.54 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.98 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.07 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.91 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.35 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $535.5M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $469.9M | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $535.5M | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $431.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $390.3M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $455.8M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $352.7M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.4M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $177.6M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | $469.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $486.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $603.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $612.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $734.8M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $933.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $951.7M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.39× | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.52× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.67× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $142.9M | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $121.1M | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.5% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.76× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $340.5M | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.5M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $298.3M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $222.5M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.5M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | $121.1M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.3M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.8M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.1M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-38.9M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.8% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.76× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.53× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.81× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.50× | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PRIM
| Energy Segment | $1.2B | 64% |
| Unit Price Contracts | $473.7M | 25% |
| Cost Reimbursable Contracts | $121.3M | 7% |
| Other | $74.9M | 4% |
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
