vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Profound Medical Corp. (PROF) and Satellogic Inc. (SATL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Satellogic Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.2M vs $6.0M, roughly 1.0× Profound Medical Corp.). Satellogic Inc. runs the higher net margin — 488.0% vs -136.8%, a 624.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
CompuGroup Medical SE & Co. KGaA is a German publicly listed software company based in Koblenz that develops and offers software for the healthcare sector. It produces cloud-based and digital application software to support medical and organizational activities in doctors' practices, pharmacies, medical laboratories and hospitals. According to its own figures, the company employed more than 9,200 people worldwide in 2022, and has over 1.6 million users in 56 countries. CompuGroup Medical shar...
Satellogic Inc. is an American company specializing in Earth-observation satellites, founded in 2010 by Emiliano Kargieman and Gerardo Richarte.
PROF vs SATL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0M | $6.2M |
| Net Profit | $-8.2M | $30.5M |
| Gross Margin | 66.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -123.3% | -114.2% |
| Net Margin | -136.8% | 488.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.27 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.2M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.7M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.7M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-18.1M |
| Q4 25 | 66.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -123.3% | -114.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -176.2% | -222.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -696.9% | -141.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -477.0% | -280.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -419.2% |
| Q4 25 | -136.8% | 488.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -157.7% | 109.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -792.3% | -149.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -458.1% | -961.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -517.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.27 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.36 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $59.7M | $94.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $66.4M | $60.5M |
| Total Assets | $77.5M | $151.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $59.7M | $94.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.2M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.4M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $66.4M | $60.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.1M | $-56.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.3M | $-68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.8M | $-83.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.1M |
| Q4 25 | $77.5M | $151.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $70.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.7M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.9M | $61.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $76.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.6M | $-9.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -204.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 53.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-34.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.6M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.6M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.7M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -204.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -267.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -115.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -195.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PROF
Segment breakdown not available.
SATL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $5.7M | 91% |
| Other | $547.0K | 9% |
