vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Precipio, Inc. (PRPO) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Velo3D, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.4M vs $6.8M, roughly 1.4× Precipio, Inc.). Precipio, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.7% vs -231.9%, a 239.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Precipio, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.4% vs -25.2%). Precipio, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($291.0K vs $-8.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Precipio, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.0% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Precipio, Inc. is a specialty diagnostic firm that develops and provides advanced oncology, genetic, and rare disease testing solutions. It primarily serves healthcare providers, clinical laboratories, and patients across the United States, with a core focus on enhancing diagnostic accuracy and improving patient health outcomes.
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
PRPO vs VELO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.8M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $526.0K | $-21.9M |
| Gross Margin | 45.9% | -73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | -231.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.7% | -231.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.4% | -25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 244.1% | -2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.36 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.8M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $526.0K | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-79.0K | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $74.0K | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-884.0K | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-365.0K | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-626.0K | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | 45.9% | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.2% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.1% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.1% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.5% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.6% | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.5% | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.3% | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.3% | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.8% | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -59.6% | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.0% | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.9% | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -59.8% | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.59 | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.42 | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.83 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.46 | $-55.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.7M | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $83.0K | $31.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.6M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $21.3M | $105.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $854.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $776.0K | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $83.0K | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.0K | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $44.0M |
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.7M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $110.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $136.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.03× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $366.0K | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $291.0K | $-8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.3% | -88.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.70× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $359.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0K | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0K | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.0K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-44.0K | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $565.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.0K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-667.0K | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | $291.0K | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-44.0K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $294.0K | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-182.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-68.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | -88.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.6% | -46.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -209.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.