vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (PSIX) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STAG Industrial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($224.2M vs $191.2M, roughly 1.2× POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs 8.4%, a 19.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.5% vs 9.1%). Over the past eight quarters, POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (41.7% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Adani Energy Solutions Ltd, formerly known as Adani Transmission Ltd, is an electric power transmission and distribution company headquartered in Ahmedabad. As of April 2025, the company operates a cumulative transmission network of 26,696 circuit kilometers and is one of the largest private sector power transmission companies operating in India.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
PSIX vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $191.2M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | $16.1M | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.5% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $191.2M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.8M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.9M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.4M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.3M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $125.8M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.6M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.6M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.2M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.7% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.22 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.94 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.3M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $96.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $178.6M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $424.7M | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.5M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.3M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.5M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.8M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.7M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.0K | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.0K | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0K | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $178.6M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.5M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.7M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.3M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.3M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.1M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $424.7M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $458.9M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.7M | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $328.2M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.1M | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.6M | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-7.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.6M | $104.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $143.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | $103.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.7M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.6M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.6M | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $86.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $822.0K | $105.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | 2.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PSIX
| Energy End Market | $153.4M | 80% |
| Industrial End Market | $33.3M | 17% |
| Transportation End Market | $4.6M | 2% |
STAG
Segment breakdown not available.
