vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PARSONS CORP (PSN) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PARSONS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.3× Snap-on). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 3.5%, a 17.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snap-on posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -7.5%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $135.6M). Over the past eight quarters, PARSONS CORP's revenue compounded faster (2.2% CAGR vs 2.0%).
Parsons Corporation is an American multinational technology-focused defense, intelligence, and infrastructure engineering firm. Founded in 1944, Parsons is headquartered in Chantilly, Virginia, and serves both government and private sector organizations in more than 30 countries.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
PSN vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $55.6M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.6% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.5% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -72.4% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.51 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $55.6M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.1M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.2M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.2M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $201.3M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.0M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.2M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-107.4M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.51 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.59 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.85 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.65 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.63 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.01 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $466.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | — |
| Total Assets | $5.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.47× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $466.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $422.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $528.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.1M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $785.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $784.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.48× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.49× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.58× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $167.5M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $135.6M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.5% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.01× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $410.4M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.5M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.8M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.8M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.8M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.8M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.0M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.2M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-63.4M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $135.6M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.7M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.4M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.3M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.0M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $287.3M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-72.9M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.7% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.01× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.89× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.18× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.63× | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.16× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.33× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PSN
| Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | $582.1M | 36% |
| Defense And Intelligence | $502.8M | 31% |
| Engineered Systems | $281.4M | 18% |
| Consolidated Joint Ventures | $216.7M | 14% |
| TRS Group Inc | $9.4M | 1% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
