vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PARSONS CORP (PSN) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.3× PARSONS CORP). Williams-Sonoma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 3.5%, a 9.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.6% vs 3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, PARSONS CORP's revenue compounded faster (-5.5% CAGR vs -9.1%).
Parsons Corporation is an American multinational technology-focused defense, intelligence, and infrastructure engineering firm. Founded in 1944, Parsons is headquartered in Chantilly, Virginia, and serves both government and private sector organizations in more than 30 countries.
Williams Sonoma is an American retailer of cookware, appliances, and home furnishings. It is owned by Williams-Sonoma, Inc., and was founded by Charles E. (Chuck) Williams in 1956.
PSN vs WSM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $52.9M | $241.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | 4.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.1% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.49 | $1.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $52.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.6M | $241.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.1M | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.2M | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.2M | $384.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $201.3M | $249.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.0M | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.2M | $265.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.0% | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.0% | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.3% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | 48.3% |
| Q1 26 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.51 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.59 | $2.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $1.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.85 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.65 | $1.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.63 | $4.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $884.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.8B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $6.0B | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.55× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $466.4M | $884.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $422.6M | $985.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.5M | $826.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $528.5M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $785.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $784.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $5.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $316.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $248.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.5M | $316.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.8M | $282.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.8M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.8M | $633.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.8M | $253.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.0M | $246.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.2M | $226.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $135.6M | $248.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.7M | $230.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.4M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.3M | $566.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.0M | $170.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $287.3M | $215.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.0M | $187.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.6% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 11.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.01× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.89× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.18× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.63× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.16× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.33× | 0.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
