vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) and SONOCO PRODUCTS CO (SON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SONOCO PRODUCTS CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $964.5M, roughly 1.7× Pure Storage, Inc.). Pure Storage, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.7% vs 4.1%, a 1.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Pure Storage, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.0% vs -1.9%). Pure Storage, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($52.6M vs $-428.3B). Over the past eight quarters, Pure Storage, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Pure Storage, Inc. is an American publicly traded technology company headquartered in Santa Clara, California, United States. It develops all-flash data storage hardware and software products. Pure Storage was founded in 2009 and developed its products in stealth mode until 2011. Afterwards, the company grew in revenues by about 50% per quarter and raised more than $470 million in venture capital funding, before going public in 2015. Initially, Pure Storage developed the software for storage ...
Sonoco Products Company is an American provider of diversified consumer packaging, industrial products, protective packaging, and packaging supply chain services and the world's largest producer of composite cans, tubes, and cores. The company was founded in 1889 as Southern Novelty Company with annualized net sales of approximately $7.3 billion. Sonoco has 19,900 employees in more than 335 operations in 33 countries, serving more than 85 nations. The company is headquartered in Hartsville, S...
PSTG vs SON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $964.5M | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $54.8M | $68.0M |
| Gross Margin | 72.3% | 20.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.7% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.0% | -1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -13.9% | 24.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $964.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $778.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $879.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $831.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $763.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.5M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $332.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.1M | $122.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.0M | $493.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $54.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.7M | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.0M | $90.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 72.3% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.2% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.9% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.5% | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 70.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.5% | 22.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.0% | 8.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.0% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.68 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $3.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $4.96 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $852.8M | $224.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $11.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.97× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $852.8M | $378.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $887.8M | $244.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $329.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $723.6M | $181.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $894.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $965.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $900.6M | $140.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $11.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $12.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $52.6M | $-428.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.5% | -25554.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 3601.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $566.7M | $-427.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.0M | $412.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.2M | $291.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.9M | $193.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $208.5M | $-208.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $97.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.6M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $221.5M | $109.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-428.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.6M | $322.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.1M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.6M | $98.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.4M | $-300.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.6M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $172.7M | $16.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | -25554.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | -17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3601.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.12× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.50× | 2.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.91× | -3.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.35× | 3.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PSTG
| US | $683.2M | 71% |
| Non Us | $281.3M | 29% |
SON
Segment breakdown not available.
