vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL) and AVITA Medical, Inc. (RCEL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $17.6M, roughly 1.5× AVITA Medical, Inc.). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -66.0%, a 83.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Postal Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.7% vs -4.3%). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.6M vs $-6.1M). Over the past eight quarters, AVITA Medical, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.0% CAGR vs 22.6%).
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is a specialized real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, and manages properties primarily leased to the United States Postal Service. Its portfolio includes last-mile postal facilities, sorting centers, and retail post office locations across the U.S., supporting critical mail and package delivery infrastructure.
Avita Medical is a clinical and commercial company developing and marketing a range regenerative medicine products. The first regenerative medicine product brought to the market by Avita Medical was ReCell spray-on skin for the treatment of burns. The two latest products are ReNovaCell, for Aesthetics and Plastic applications including skin trauma, and ReGenerCell for the treatment of chronic wounds. The Avita Medical regenerative product range is currently marketed in Europe, the Middle East...
PSTL vs RCEL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $17.6M |
| Net Profit | $4.6M | $-11.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.2% |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | -59.1% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | -66.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.7% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | -0.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $-0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.1M | $18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $817.0K | $-15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.0K | $-18.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 84.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 83.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 86.4% |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | -59.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | -53.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.3% | -60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | -63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.2% | -54.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | -70.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | -102.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | -155.0% |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | -66.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | -77.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | -74.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.1% | -63.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | -82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | -101.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | -168.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.13 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5M | $18.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $361.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $285.2M | $-16.6M |
| Total Assets | $759.1M | $56.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.27× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.0K | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | $35.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $970.0K | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $54.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $68.2M |
| Q4 25 | $361.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $347.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $328.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $247.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $285.2M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $273.9M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $250.8M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $245.5M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.6M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.5M | $23.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $32.6M |
| Q4 25 | $759.1M | $56.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.2M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $689.8M | $58.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.0M | $69.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $646.8M | $79.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $615.1M | $81.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $608.2M | $87.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $584.1M | $97.4M |
| Q4 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $44.5M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.6M | $-6.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 144.5% | -34.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 26.7% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $65.6M | $-33.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.8M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.5M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $-20.9M |
| Q4 25 | $37.6M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.7M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.8M | $-22.0M |
| Q4 25 | 144.5% | -34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.1% | -36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.8% | -58.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.9% | -56.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 143.8% | -52.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.6% | -56.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | -101.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | -198.2% |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 9.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.10× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
