vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL) and Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $15.8M, roughly 1.6× Spire Global, Inc.). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -176.6%, a 194.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Postal Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.7% vs -26.9%). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.6M vs $-16.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Postal Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.6% CAGR vs -32.6%).
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is a specialized real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, and manages properties primarily leased to the United States Postal Service. Its portfolio includes last-mile postal facilities, sorting centers, and retail post office locations across the U.S., supporting critical mail and package delivery infrastructure.
Spire Global, Inc. is a space-to-cloud data and analytics company that specializes in the tracking of global data sets powered by a large constellation of nanosatellites, such as the tracking of maritime, aviation and weather patterns.
PSTL vs SPIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $15.8M |
| Net Profit | $4.6M | $-28.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.2% |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | -164.1% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | -176.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.7% | -26.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 42.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $-0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.1M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $34.8M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $119.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $-48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $817.0K | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.0K | $-25.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | -164.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | -166.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.3% | -122.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | -106.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.2% | -144.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | -48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | -48.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | -34.4% |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | -176.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | -155.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 623.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | -86.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.1% | -225.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | -43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | -73.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.13 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $3.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $-1.93 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5M | $81.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $361.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $285.2M | $112.9M |
| Total Assets | $759.1M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.27× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $117.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.0K | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $970.0K | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $45.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $63.7M |
| Q4 25 | $361.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $347.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $328.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.7M | $103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.7M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.0M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.7M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $247.6M | $123.1M |
| Q4 25 | $285.2M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $273.9M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $250.8M | $149.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $245.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.3M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.6M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.5M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $52.5M |
| Q4 25 | $759.1M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.2M | $224.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $689.8M | $239.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.0M | $208.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $646.8M | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $615.1M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $608.2M | $230.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $584.1M | $252.3M |
| Q4 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.25× | 27.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.13× | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.11× | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.00× | 2.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $44.5M | $-4.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.6M | $-16.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 144.5% | -102.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 26.7% | 75.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $65.6M | $-92.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $-35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.8M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.5M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $37.6M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $-38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.7M | $-24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.8M | $-15.9M |
| Q4 25 | 144.5% | -102.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.1% | -161.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.8% | -201.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.9% | -72.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 143.8% | -112.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.6% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | -39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | -45.7% |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | 66.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | 9.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.16× | -0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.10× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
