vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips 66 (PSX) and United Parcel Service (UPS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phillips 66 is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($34.1B vs $21.2B, roughly 1.6× United Parcel Service). Phillips 66 runs the higher net margin — 8.5% vs 4.1%, a 4.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phillips 66 posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.3% vs -1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, United Parcel Service's revenue compounded faster (-1.4% CAGR vs -2.4%).
The Phillips 66 Company is an American multinational energy company headquartered in Westchase, Houston, Texas. Its name, dating back to 1927 as a trademark of the Phillips Petroleum Company, assisted in establishing the newly reconfigured Phillips 66. The company today was formed ten years after Phillips merged with Conoco to form ConocoPhillips.
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is an American multinational shipping & receiving and supply chain management company founded in 1907. Originally known as the American Messenger Company specializing in telegraphs, UPS has expanded to become a Fortune 500 company and one of the world's largest shipping couriers. UPS today is primarily known for its ground shipping services as well as the UPS Store, a retail chain which assists UPS shipments and provides tools for small businesses.
PSX vs UPS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.1B | $21.2B |
| Net Profit | $2.9B | $864.0M |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 8.5% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.3% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36225.0% | -27.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.14 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $21.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.1B | $24.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.5B | $21.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3B | $21.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.4B | $21.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7B | $25.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5B | $22.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.1B | $21.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $864.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $877.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.14 | $2.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | $1.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.15 | $1.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.18 | $1.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $2.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.38 | $1.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $5.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | $23.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $73.7B | $71.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.64× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $6.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7B | $23.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.2B | $23.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2B | $23.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.7B | $19.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2B | $19.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.5B | $20.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.2B | $20.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.1B | $16.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.9B | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.5B | $15.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3B | $15.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.4B | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.7B | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.5B | $17.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $71.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7B | $73.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.1B | $71.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.9B | $70.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.8B | $68.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.6B | $70.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.1B | $68.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.9B | $69.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.64× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.71× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.65× | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.67× | 1.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.8B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.95× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $4.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $845.0M | $348.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-775.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $655.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.95× | 1.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.86× | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.96× | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 149.75× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.27× | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PSX
| Marketing Speciality Segment | $21.7B | 64% |
| Crude Oil | $3.7B | 11% |
| GB | $3.5B | 10% |
| Other Geographical Areas | $2.4B | 7% |
| DE | $1.1B | 3% |
| Renewable Fuels | $876.0M | 3% |
| Other Product Line | $634.0M | 2% |
UPS
| U.S. Domestic Package | $14.1B | 67% |
| International Package | $4.5B | 21% |
| Supply Chain Solutions | $2.5B | 12% |
