vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PubMatic, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.6M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.2× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -20.0%, a 30.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sila Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -2.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Sila Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -3.6%).
PubMatic, Inc. develops and implements online advertising software and strategies for the digital publishing and advertising industry. PubMatic's sell-side, real-time programmatic ad transaction advertising software puts publishers of websites, videos, and mobile apps into contact with ad buyers by using automated systems, while allowing users to opt-out of having their personal information collected on internet searches. PubMatic has a number of offices in countries around the world.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
PUBM vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.6M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $-12.5M | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -20.0% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.0% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.9% | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.27 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $62.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.0M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.1M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.8M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.5M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.8M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.3M | $43.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-12.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.5M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-912.0K | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $4.6M |
| Q1 26 | 58.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 68.2% | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.6% | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.6% | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.9% | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 70.8% | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.5% | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.6% | 86.6% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | -20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.5% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 10.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.14 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $144.9M | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $251.0M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $659.4M | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $144.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $145.5M | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.5M | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.5M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.8M | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.5M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.9M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.5M | $87.0M |
| Q1 26 | $251.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $262.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $243.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $275.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $277.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.7M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $659.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $680.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $676.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $675.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $668.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $739.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $689.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $673.1M | $2.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $17.3M | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $10.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $63.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.4M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $31.6M |
| Q1 26 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.06× | 6.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.