vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and QUALYS, INC. (QLYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ProPetro Holding Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($289.7M vs $175.3M, roughly 1.7× QUALYS, INC.). On growth, QUALYS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -9.6%). QUALYS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($74.9M vs $16.8M). Over the past eight quarters, QUALYS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs -15.5%).

ProPetro Holding Corp. is a leading U.S.-based oilfield services provider. It offers hydraulic fracturing, well completion and related supporting services primarily to onshore oil and gas exploration and production operators, with core operations concentrated in the Permian Basin spanning Texas and New Mexico.

Qualys, Inc. is an American technology firm based in Foster City, California, specializing in cloud security, compliance and related services.

PUMP vs QLYS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PUMP
PUMP
1.7× larger
PUMP
$289.7M
$175.3M
QLYS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
QLYS
QLYS
+19.7% gap
QLYS
10.1%
-9.6%
PUMP
More free cash flow
QLYS
QLYS
$58.1M more FCF
QLYS
$74.9M
$16.8M
PUMP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
QLYS
QLYS
Annualised
QLYS
9.6%
-15.5%
PUMP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Revenue
$289.7M
$175.3M
Net Profit
$53.1M
Gross Margin
83.4%
Operating Margin
2.1%
33.6%
Net Margin
30.3%
Revenue YoY
-9.6%
10.1%
Net Profit YoY
20.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.01
$1.47

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
$289.7M
$175.3M
Q3 25
$293.9M
$169.9M
Q2 25
$326.2M
$164.1M
Q1 25
$359.4M
$159.9M
Q4 24
$320.6M
$159.2M
Q3 24
$360.9M
$153.9M
Q2 24
$357.0M
$148.7M
Q1 24
$405.8M
$145.8M
Net Profit
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
$53.1M
Q3 25
$-2.4M
$50.3M
Q2 25
$-7.2M
$47.3M
Q1 25
$9.6M
$47.5M
Q4 24
$44.0M
Q3 24
$-137.1M
$46.2M
Q2 24
$-3.7M
$43.8M
Q1 24
$19.9M
$39.7M
Gross Margin
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
83.4%
Q3 25
83.6%
Q2 25
82.4%
Q1 25
81.9%
Q4 24
81.8%
Q3 24
81.3%
Q2 24
82.2%
Q1 24
81.3%
Operating Margin
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
2.1%
33.6%
Q3 25
-2.1%
35.3%
Q2 25
-1.0%
31.3%
Q1 25
2.6%
32.4%
Q4 24
-5.8%
31.0%
Q3 24
-49.4%
29.2%
Q2 24
-0.1%
32.3%
Q1 24
7.5%
30.7%
Net Margin
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
30.3%
Q3 25
-0.8%
29.6%
Q2 25
-2.2%
28.8%
Q1 25
2.7%
29.7%
Q4 24
27.6%
Q3 24
-38.0%
30.0%
Q2 24
-1.0%
29.4%
Q1 24
4.9%
27.2%
EPS (diluted)
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
$0.01
$1.47
Q3 25
$-0.02
$1.39
Q2 25
$-0.07
$1.29
Q1 25
$0.09
$1.29
Q4 24
$-0.14
$1.19
Q3 24
$-1.32
$1.24
Q2 24
$-0.03
$1.17
Q1 24
$0.18
$1.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$91.3M
$250.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$829.8M
$561.2M
Total Assets
$1.3B
$1.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
$91.3M
$250.3M
Q3 25
$76.7M
$225.3M
Q2 25
$83.0M
$194.0M
Q1 25
$71.4M
$290.7M
Q4 24
$58.3M
$232.2M
Q3 24
$54.0M
$235.4M
Q2 24
$74.7M
$281.2M
Q1 24
$53.6M
$273.8M
Stockholders' Equity
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
$829.8M
$561.2M
Q3 25
$826.2M
$529.4M
Q2 25
$824.0M
$508.2M
Q1 25
$826.5M
$498.0M
Q4 24
$816.3M
$477.1M
Q3 24
$833.0M
$449.6M
Q2 24
$975.8M
$427.8M
Q1 24
$998.2M
$404.2M
Total Assets
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
$1.3B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$999.5M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$996.5M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$973.5M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$908.3M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$876.6M
Q1 24
$1.2B
$861.8M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$81.0M
$75.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$16.8M
$74.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
5.8%
42.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
22.2%
0.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.42×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$45.3M
$304.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
$81.0M
$75.7M
Q3 25
$41.7M
$90.4M
Q2 25
$54.2M
$33.8M
Q1 25
$54.7M
$109.6M
Q4 24
$37.9M
$47.7M
Q3 24
$34.7M
$61.0M
Q2 24
$104.9M
$49.8M
Q1 24
$74.8M
$85.5M
Free Cash Flow
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
$16.8M
$74.9M
Q3 25
$-2.4M
$89.5M
Q2 25
$17.1M
$32.4M
Q1 25
$13.8M
$107.5M
Q4 24
$10.0M
$41.9M
Q3 24
$-6.0M
$57.6M
Q2 24
$67.7M
$48.8M
Q1 24
$40.2M
$83.5M
FCF Margin
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
5.8%
42.8%
Q3 25
-0.8%
52.7%
Q2 25
5.2%
19.8%
Q1 25
3.8%
67.3%
Q4 24
3.1%
26.3%
Q3 24
-1.7%
37.4%
Q2 24
19.0%
32.8%
Q1 24
9.9%
57.2%
Capex Intensity
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
22.2%
0.4%
Q3 25
15.0%
0.5%
Q2 25
11.4%
0.8%
Q1 25
11.4%
1.3%
Q4 24
8.7%
3.7%
Q3 24
11.3%
2.2%
Q2 24
10.4%
0.7%
Q1 24
8.5%
1.4%
Cash Conversion
PUMP
PUMP
QLYS
QLYS
Q4 25
1.42×
Q3 25
1.80×
Q2 25
0.71×
Q1 25
5.70×
2.31×
Q4 24
1.09×
Q3 24
1.32×
Q2 24
1.14×
Q1 24
3.75×
2.15×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

PUMP
PUMP

Hydraulic Fracturing Segment$203.9M70%
Wireline Operating Segment$55.4M19%
Cementing Operating Segment$29.6M10%

QLYS
QLYS

Sales Channel Through Intermediary$88.6M51%
Sales Channel Directly To Consumer$86.7M49%

Related Comparisons