vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyperliquid Strategies Inc (PURR) and SciSparc Ltd. (SPRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($500.0K vs $461.0K, roughly 1.1× SciSparc Ltd.). SciSparc Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -2041.6% vs -60892.6%, a 58851.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
SciSparc Ltd. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel therapies for unmet medical needs in the neurological, psychiatric, and gastrointestinal disorder segments. It operates across global biotech markets, leveraging proprietary cannabinoid-based formulation technologies to advance its pipeline of therapeutic candidates.
PURR vs SPRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $500.0K | $461.0K |
| Net Profit | $-304.5M | $-9.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.1% |
| Operating Margin | -57509.2% | -588.5% |
| Net Margin | -60892.6% | -2041.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -45.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -155.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-7.43 | $17.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $500.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $461.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $466.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $840.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-304.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 74.2% |
| Q4 25 | -57509.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -588.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -813.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -419.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -150.5% |
| Q4 25 | -60892.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2041.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -813.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -438.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -148.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-7.43 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.70 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $10.85 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $281.9M | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $589.8M | $-81.0K |
| Total Assets | $616.6M | $5.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $281.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $252.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | $589.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-81.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | $616.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $9.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -261.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.