vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Qualcomm (QCOM) and Texas Instruments (TXN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Texas Instruments is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.4B vs $12.3B, roughly 1.5× Qualcomm). Qualcomm runs the higher net margin — 24.5% vs 8.4%, a 16.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Texas Instruments posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.6% vs 5.0%). Qualcomm produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.4B vs $1.4B). Over the past eight quarters, Texas Instruments's revenue compounded faster (119.6% CAGR vs 14.2%).

Qualcomm Incorporated is an American multinational corporation headquartered in San Diego, California, and incorporated in Delaware. It creates semiconductors, software and services related to wireless technology. It owns patents critical to the 5G, 4G, CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA and WCDMA mobile communications standards.

Texas Instruments Incorporated (TI) is an American multinational semiconductor company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is one of the top 10 semiconductor companies worldwide based on sales volume. The company's focus is on developing analog chips and embedded processors, which account for more than 80% of its revenue. TI also produces digital light processing (DLP) technology and education technology products including calculators, microcontrollers, and multi-core processors.

QCOM vs TXN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TXN
TXN
1.5× larger
TXN
$18.4B
$12.3B
QCOM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TXN
TXN
+13.6% gap
TXN
18.6%
5.0%
QCOM
Higher net margin
QCOM
QCOM
16.1% more per $
QCOM
24.5%
8.4%
TXN
More free cash flow
QCOM
QCOM
$3.0B more FCF
QCOM
$4.4B
$1.4B
TXN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TXN
TXN
Annualised
TXN
119.6%
14.2%
QCOM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Revenue
$12.3B
$18.4B
Net Profit
$3.0B
$1.5B
Gross Margin
54.6%
15.2%
Operating Margin
27.5%
9.8%
Net Margin
24.5%
8.4%
Revenue YoY
5.0%
18.6%
Net Profit YoY
-5.5%
31.0%
EPS (diluted)
$2.78
$1.68

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$18.4B
Q4 25
$12.3B
$4.4B
Q3 25
$11.3B
$4.7B
Q2 25
$10.4B
$4.4B
Q1 25
$11.0B
$4.1B
Q4 24
$11.7B
$4.0B
Q3 24
$10.2B
$4.2B
Q2 24
$9.4B
$3.8B
Net Profit
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$3.0B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$-3.1B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$2.7B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$2.8B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$1.1B
Gross Margin
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
15.2%
Q4 25
54.6%
55.9%
Q3 25
55.3%
57.4%
Q2 25
55.6%
57.9%
Q1 25
55.0%
56.8%
Q4 24
55.8%
57.7%
Q3 24
56.4%
59.6%
Q2 24
55.6%
57.8%
Operating Margin
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
9.8%
Q4 25
27.5%
33.3%
Q3 25
25.9%
35.1%
Q2 25
26.6%
35.1%
Q1 25
28.4%
32.5%
Q4 24
30.5%
34.4%
Q3 24
25.2%
37.4%
Q2 24
23.6%
32.7%
Net Margin
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
8.4%
Q4 25
24.5%
26.3%
Q3 25
-27.7%
28.8%
Q2 25
25.7%
29.1%
Q1 25
25.6%
29.0%
Q4 24
27.3%
30.1%
Q3 24
28.5%
32.8%
Q2 24
22.7%
29.5%
EPS (diluted)
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$1.68
Q4 25
$2.78
$1.28
Q3 25
$-2.77
$1.48
Q2 25
$2.43
$1.41
Q1 25
$2.52
$1.28
Q4 24
$2.83
$1.31
Q3 24
$2.57
$1.47
Q2 24
$1.88
$1.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$11.8B
$5.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$14.8B
$14.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$23.1B
$16.8B
Total Assets
$53.0B
$34.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.64×
0.84×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$5.1B
Q4 25
$11.8B
$4.9B
Q3 25
$10.2B
$5.2B
Q2 25
$10.0B
$5.4B
Q1 25
$13.8B
$5.0B
Q4 24
$14.3B
$7.6B
Q3 24
$13.3B
$8.8B
Q2 24
$13.0B
$9.7B
Total Debt
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$14.1B
Q4 25
$14.8B
$14.0B
Q3 25
$14.8B
$14.0B
Q2 25
$14.8B
$14.0B
Q1 25
$13.3B
$12.8B
Q4 24
$13.2B
$13.6B
Q3 24
$13.3B
$13.9B
Q2 24
$13.2B
$13.9B
Stockholders' Equity
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$16.8B
Q4 25
$23.1B
$16.3B
Q3 25
$21.2B
$16.6B
Q2 25
$27.2B
$16.4B
Q1 25
$27.7B
$16.4B
Q4 24
$26.9B
$16.9B
Q3 24
$26.3B
$17.3B
Q2 24
$24.7B
$17.2B
Total Assets
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$34.4B
Q4 25
$53.0B
$34.6B
Q3 25
$50.1B
$35.0B
Q2 25
$54.9B
$34.9B
Q1 25
$55.4B
$33.8B
Q4 24
$55.6B
$35.5B
Q3 24
$55.2B
$35.3B
Q2 24
$52.7B
$35.0B
Debt / Equity
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
0.84×
Q4 25
0.64×
0.86×
Q3 25
0.70×
0.84×
Q2 25
0.54×
0.86×
Q1 25
0.48×
0.78×
Q4 24
0.49×
0.80×
Q3 24
0.51×
0.80×
Q2 24
0.53×
0.81×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$5.0B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$4.4B
$1.4B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
36.0%
7.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.5%
3.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.65×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$12.9B
$4.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$5.0B
$2.3B
Q3 25
$4.0B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$849.0M
Q4 24
$4.6B
$2.0B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$3.1B
$1.6B
Free Cash Flow
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$1.4B
Q4 25
$4.4B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$3.6B
$993.0M
Q2 25
$2.6B
$555.0M
Q1 25
$2.3B
$-274.0M
Q4 24
$4.3B
$806.0M
Q3 24
$2.4B
$416.0M
Q2 24
$2.7B
$507.0M
FCF Margin
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
7.6%
Q4 25
36.0%
30.0%
Q3 25
31.8%
20.9%
Q2 25
24.9%
12.5%
Q1 25
21.3%
-6.7%
Q4 24
36.9%
20.1%
Q3 24
23.3%
10.0%
Q2 24
28.4%
13.3%
Capex Intensity
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
3.7%
Q4 25
4.5%
20.9%
Q3 25
3.6%
25.2%
Q2 25
2.8%
29.3%
Q1 25
1.9%
27.6%
Q4 24
2.4%
29.7%
Q3 24
2.5%
31.7%
Q2 24
4.1%
27.8%
Cash Conversion
QCOM
QCOM
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.65×
1.94×
Q3 25
1.61×
Q2 25
1.08×
1.44×
Q1 25
0.91×
0.72×
Q4 24
1.44×
1.66×
Q3 24
0.91×
1.27×
Q2 24
1.43×
1.39×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

QCOM
QCOM

Handsets$7.8B64%
Io T$1.7B14%
Qtl$1.6B13%
Automotive$1.1B9%

TXN
TXN

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons