vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Vistra Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.9× Restaurant Brands International Inc.). Restaurant Brands International Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 4.8%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vistra Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 7.4%). Vistra Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($596.0M vs $453.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Vistra Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (23.3% CAGR vs 19.1%).

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (RBI) is an American-Canadian multinational fast food holding company. It was formed in 2014 by the $12.5 billion merger between American fast food restaurant chain Burger King and Canadian coffee shop and restaurant chain Tim Hortons, and expanded by the purchases of Popeyes and Firehouse Subs in 2017 and 2021, respectively. The company is the fifth-largest operator of fast food restaurants in the world after Subway, McDonald's, Starbucks and Yum! Brands....

Vistra may refer to either of two companies:Vistra, a corporate services company based in Hong Kong Vistra Corp, an energy company based in Texas

QSR vs VST — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
VST
VST
1.9× larger
VST
$4.8B
$2.5B
QSR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VST
VST
+23.8% gap
VST
31.2%
7.4%
QSR
Higher net margin
QSR
QSR
1.4% more per $
QSR
6.3%
4.8%
VST
More free cash flow
VST
VST
$143.0M more FCF
VST
$596.0M
$453.0M
QSR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VST
VST
Annualised
VST
23.3%
19.1%
QSR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Revenue
$2.5B
$4.8B
Net Profit
$155.0M
$233.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
25.2%
9.9%
Net Margin
6.3%
4.8%
Revenue YoY
7.4%
31.2%
Net Profit YoY
-57.1%
-47.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.33
$0.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
$2.5B
$4.8B
Q3 25
$2.4B
$4.8B
Q2 25
$2.4B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$2.1B
$4.3B
Q4 24
$2.3B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$2.3B
$4.3B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$3.6B
Q1 24
$1.7B
$3.2B
Net Profit
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
$155.0M
$233.0M
Q3 25
$436.0M
$652.0M
Q2 25
$263.0M
$327.0M
Q1 25
$221.0M
$-268.0M
Q4 24
$361.0M
$441.0M
Q3 24
$357.0M
$1.9B
Q2 24
$399.0M
$365.0M
Q1 24
$328.0M
$-35.0M
Gross Margin
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
65.2%
Operating Margin
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
25.2%
9.9%
Q3 25
27.1%
21.7%
Q2 25
20.0%
13.7%
Q1 25
20.6%
-2.8%
Q4 24
27.7%
16.4%
Q3 24
25.2%
59.6%
Q2 24
31.9%
22.5%
Q1 24
31.3%
2.7%
Net Margin
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
6.3%
4.8%
Q3 25
17.8%
13.6%
Q2 25
10.9%
8.7%
Q1 25
10.5%
-6.3%
Q4 24
15.7%
12.0%
Q3 24
15.6%
43.5%
Q2 24
19.2%
10.1%
Q1 24
18.9%
-1.1%
EPS (diluted)
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
$0.33
$0.55
Q3 25
$0.96
$1.75
Q2 25
$0.57
$0.81
Q1 25
$0.49
$-0.93
Q4 24
$0.79
$1.09
Q3 24
$0.79
$5.25
Q2 24
$0.88
$0.90
Q1 24
$0.72
$-0.24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$785.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$13.3B
$15.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.6B
$5.1B
Total Assets
$25.6B
$41.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.65×
3.11×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
$785.0M
Q3 25
$602.0M
Q2 25
$458.0M
Q1 25
$561.0M
Q4 24
$1.2B
Q3 24
$905.0M
Q2 24
$1.6B
Q1 24
$1.1B
Total Debt
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
$13.3B
$15.8B
Q3 25
$13.5B
$15.8B
Q2 25
$13.6B
$15.5B
Q1 25
$13.6B
$15.4B
Q4 24
$13.6B
$15.4B
Q3 24
$13.7B
$13.9B
Q2 24
$13.7B
$13.9B
Q1 24
$12.9B
$14.7B
Stockholders' Equity
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
$3.6B
$5.1B
Q3 25
$3.4B
$5.2B
Q2 25
$3.3B
$4.8B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$4.8B
Q4 24
$3.1B
$5.6B
Q3 24
$3.2B
$5.4B
Q2 24
$3.1B
$5.6B
Q1 24
$3.0B
$5.7B
Total Assets
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
$25.6B
$41.5B
Q3 25
$25.7B
$38.0B
Q2 25
$25.7B
$38.1B
Q1 25
$24.9B
$38.2B
Q4 24
$24.6B
$37.8B
Q3 24
$25.1B
$37.9B
Q2 24
$24.8B
$39.1B
Q1 24
$23.1B
$38.2B
Debt / Equity
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
3.65×
3.11×
Q3 25
3.99×
3.02×
Q2 25
4.10×
3.22×
Q1 25
4.37×
3.20×
Q4 24
4.39×
2.77×
Q3 24
4.22×
2.56×
Q2 24
4.46×
2.49×
Q1 24
4.35×
2.60×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$555.0M
$1.4B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$453.0M
$596.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
18.4%
12.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.1%
17.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.58×
6.15×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.4B
$1.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
$555.0M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$592.0M
$1.5B
Q2 25
$449.0M
$572.0M
Q1 25
$118.0M
$599.0M
Q4 24
$481.0M
$1.4B
Q3 24
$540.0M
$1.7B
Q2 24
$334.0M
$1.2B
Q1 24
$148.0M
$312.0M
Free Cash Flow
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
$453.0M
$596.0M
Q3 25
$531.0M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$411.0M
$-118.0M
Q1 25
$54.0M
$-169.0M
Q4 24
$404.0M
$923.0M
Q3 24
$485.0M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$291.0M
$698.0M
Q1 24
$122.0M
$-153.0M
FCF Margin
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
18.4%
12.4%
Q3 25
21.7%
21.1%
Q2 25
17.1%
-3.1%
Q1 25
2.6%
-4.0%
Q4 24
17.6%
25.2%
Q3 24
21.2%
23.4%
Q2 24
14.0%
19.4%
Q1 24
7.0%
-4.8%
Capex Intensity
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
4.1%
17.4%
Q3 25
2.5%
9.6%
Q2 25
1.6%
18.4%
Q1 25
3.0%
18.1%
Q4 24
3.4%
11.7%
Q3 24
2.4%
15.8%
Q2 24
2.1%
13.8%
Q1 24
1.5%
14.7%
Cash Conversion
QSR
QSR
VST
VST
Q4 25
3.58×
6.15×
Q3 25
1.36×
2.25×
Q2 25
1.71×
1.75×
Q1 25
0.53×
Q4 24
1.33×
3.07×
Q3 24
1.51×
0.90×
Q2 24
0.84×
3.28×
Q1 24
0.45×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

QSR
QSR

CA$1.0B41%
Other$330.0M13%
Advertising$308.0M12%
Others$284.0M12%
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen$195.0M8%
Burger King$185.0M8%
Royalty$87.0M4%
Firehouse Subs$59.0M2%
Franchisor$7.0M0%

VST
VST

Retail Energy Charge In ERCOT$2.1B43%
Retail Energy Charge In Northeast Midwest$1.2B24%
East Segment$1.1B24%
Hedging Revenue Realized$170.0M4%
Revenue From Other Wholesale Contracts$116.0M2%
Transferable Production Tax Credit Revenues$78.0M2%
West Segment$77.0M2%
Intersegment Sales$25.0M1%

Related Comparisons