vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of QUICKLOGIC Corp (QUIK) and Satellogic Inc. (SATL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Satellogic Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.2M vs $5.7M, roughly 1.1× QUICKLOGIC Corp). Satellogic Inc. runs the higher net margin — 488.0% vs -5.4%, a 493.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. QUICKLOGIC Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.2M vs $-12.8M).
QuickLogic Corp is a fabless semiconductor company developing low-power customizable FPGAs, embedded FPGA IP, and edge sensor processing solutions. Its offerings serve global wearables, IoT, mobile electronics, and industrial markets, enabling energy-efficient low-latency on-device processing for edge AI and sensing use cases.
Satellogic Inc. is an American company specializing in Earth-observation satellites, founded in 2010 by Emiliano Kargieman and Gerardo Richarte.
QUIK vs SATL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.7M | $6.2M |
| Net Profit | $-305.0K | $30.5M |
| Gross Margin | 62.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | -114.2% |
| Net Margin | -5.4% | 488.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -24.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -114.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-305.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $108.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -114.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -222.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -141.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -280.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.3% | -419.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 488.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 109.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -149.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -961.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -49.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.8% | -517.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $94.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.9M | $60.5M |
| Total Assets | $51.9M | $151.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $60.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-56.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.8M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $151.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $70.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $61.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $76.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.0K | $-9.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2M | $-12.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.6% | -204.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 22.6% | 53.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.4M | $-34.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-220.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-83.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -204.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -267.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -115.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -195.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -102.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 96.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
QUIK
| North America | $3.0M | 53% |
| Other | $2.7M | 47% |
SATL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $5.7M | 91% |
| Other | $547.0K | 9% |
