vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of QXO, Inc. (QXO) and RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD (RNR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.0× QXO, Inc.). RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 23.5% vs -4.1%, a 27.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, QXO, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14782.6% vs -36.8%).
Brad Jacobs is an American businessman who is chairman and CEO of QXO, Inc.
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd is a Bermudian provider of reinsurance, insurance and other related business services. The company operates in reinsurance, insurance and ventures.
QXO vs RNR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $-90.3M | $515.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -4.1% | 23.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 14782.6% | -36.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -899.4% | 72.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $6.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-90.3M | $760.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-139.4M | $916.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-58.5M | $835.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-189.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $503.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.2% | 42.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 46.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.5% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $16.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | $19.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $17.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.4B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.7B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $15.9B | $53.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.31× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $53.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.9B | $53.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6B | $54.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1B | $54.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $50.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $52.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.31× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.31× | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.31× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $186.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $186.6M | $483.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-174.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $157.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $778.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.