vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RB GLOBAL INC. (RBA) and TRINET GROUP, INC. (TNET). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRINET GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.0× RB GLOBAL INC.). On growth, RB GLOBAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.4% vs -2.2%). RB GLOBAL INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($186.5M vs $43.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RB GLOBAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.3% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), or simply Ritchie Bros., is a publicly traded company legally domiciled in Canada with headquarters in Westchester, Illinois. Its common shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange.
TriNet Group, Inc. is a professional employer organization for small and medium-sized businesses. TriNet administers payroll and health benefits and advises clients on employment law compliance and risk reduction, acting in some cases as an outsourced human resources department. TriNet is headquartered in Dublin, California. TriNet partners with organizations between 3 and 2,500 employees.
RBA vs TNET — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $109.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 0.1% |
| Net Margin | 9.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 5.4% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.53 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $109.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.8M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.4M | $85.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.1M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.1M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.4M | $91.0M |
| Q4 25 | 14.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.7% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.1% | 7.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.53 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.43 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.55 | $1.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.54 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.53 | $1.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $531.5M | $287.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.6B | $54.0M |
| Total Assets | $12.1B | $3.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.42× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $531.5M | $287.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $674.7M | $321.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $710.2M | $407.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.1M | $349.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $533.9M | $360.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.7M | $301.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $599.5M | $249.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.8M | $383.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $110.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5B | $107.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $69.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $129.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | $143.0M |
| Q4 25 | $12.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0B | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.58× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $255.2M | $61.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $186.5M | $43.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.5% | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.7% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.33× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $719.2M | $234.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $255.2M | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.7M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $326.5M | $75.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.8M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.5M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $285.4M | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.3M | $39.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $91.0M |
| Q4 25 | $186.5M | $43.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.5M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $241.7M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.5M | $79.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.9M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.5M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.6M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.6M | $73.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.2% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.51× | 2.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.97× | 2.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | 1.12× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.75× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.04× | 0.65× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.16× | 1.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RBA
| Buyer Revenue | $577.2M | 48% |
| Seller Revenue | $255.2M | 21% |
| CA | $199.0M | 17% |
| Other | $124.7M | 10% |
| AU | $47.3M | 4% |
TNET
| Insurance Services | $1.1B | 85% |
| Professional Services | $169.0M | 14% |
