vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AVITA Medical, Inc. (RCEL) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AVITA Medical, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.6M vs $9.4M, roughly 1.9× Velo3D, Inc.). AVITA Medical, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -66.0% vs -231.9%, a 166.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AVITA Medical, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.3% vs -25.2%). AVITA Medical, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.1M vs $-8.3M). Over the past eight quarters, AVITA Medical, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.0% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Avita Medical is a clinical and commercial company developing and marketing a range regenerative medicine products. The first regenerative medicine product brought to the market by Avita Medical was ReCell spray-on skin for the treatment of burns. The two latest products are ReNovaCell, for Aesthetics and Plastic applications including skin trauma, and ReGenerCell for the treatment of chronic wounds. The Avita Medical regenerative product range is currently marketed in Europe, the Middle East...
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
RCEL vs VELO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.6M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $-21.9M |
| Gross Margin | 81.2% | -73.6% |
| Operating Margin | -59.1% | -231.0% |
| Net Margin | -66.0% | -231.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.3% | -25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -0.3% | -2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.5M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.4M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.5M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.2M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.9M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.9M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.6M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.2M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.4M | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.7M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | 81.2% | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.2% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 84.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.6% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 83.7% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 86.1% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 86.4% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | -59.1% | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.6% | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.5% | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -63.9% | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.1% | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.6% | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -102.8% | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -155.0% | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | -66.0% | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -77.3% | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -53.9% | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -74.9% | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -63.0% | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.9% | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -101.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -168.0% | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.46 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.53 | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.62 | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.60 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.73 | $-55.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.2M | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $31.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-16.6M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $56.4M | $105.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.7M | $854.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.9M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.1M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.2M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $44.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.6M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.7M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.9M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.6M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.9M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.6M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $56.4M | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.7M | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.1M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.6M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.7M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.1M | $110.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.8M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.4M | $136.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.4M | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.1M | $-8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -34.7% | -88.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-33.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.4M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.2M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.8M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-20.9M | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.1M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.2M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.8M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.4M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.0M | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | -34.7% | -88.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -36.1% | -46.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -58.4% | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -56.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.7% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.1% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -101.6% | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -198.2% | -209.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.3% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
